Tag Archives: donald trump

the nuclear football – Trump at least as insane as Nixon, without the courageous people around him willing to protect the rest of us

Leave a reply

This is a statement by 36 doctors (by my count, but I only counted once) from the April 30, 2026 U.S. Senate Congressional Record. Sure, it’s political, did I mention this is the SENATE?

Objectively observable signs of serious medical concern include…Escalating violence that threatens national and global stability. As Commander in-Chief of our military—more than 5,000 nuclear warheads in inter-continental missile silos, on submarines, and in bombers around the world, are ready for launch solely upon his order, and no one now has the authority to countermand his order.

On August 7, 1974, as President Richard Nixon’s impeachment loomed, White House Chief of Staff, General Alexander Haig, was so alarmed by Nixon’s wandering the halls of the White House at night, sleepless, distraught, and heavily intoxicated, talking out loud to portraits of past presidents on the walls, that he alerted Defense Secretary James Schlesinger. Equally alarmed, Schlesinger directed Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General George S. Brown, that any military orders from Nixon—especially nuclear ones—first be cleared through him or Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. It has been reported that the nuclear ‘‘football’’ that contains the codes for a nuclear launch was then quietly removed from Nixon’s control.

The public and those with the power to address such potentially catastrophic conditions must ask themselves if they—and we— are confident that officials such as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio would do the same.

Well, my first thought is this may have technically been a military coup. My second thought is that no single person should have the power to order a violent attack, nuclear or otherwise. Ideally, you’d like a Congressional vote. Realistically, there have to be some sort of emergency provisions for a quick decision. Granted, the decision might need to happen fast, but there should be ways in the modern age for say at least three people to confer quickly and make a decision. I suppose the decision makers should probably be elected civilians. Our current system puts us at the mercy of Mad King Donald with his finger on the trigger (although on the subject of the playground name calling our political discourse has devolved to, I am warming to Lame Duck Donald or Lame Donald Duck).

This might be taken down by the time you got a chance to read this post… I would like to see the Democrats recruit an actor or comedian who can do an entire debate in the persona of Donald Duck. If we aren’t going to be informed, we might as well be entertained. Then again, I find this just a bit too insane and mean spirited to be truly funny.

Democracy on Trial

Leave a reply

As we approach the U.S. midterm elections, I recommend everyone reading this watch the 2024 PBS Frontline documentary Democracy on Trial. It does a great job laying out the facts about the January 6, 2021 attacks – footage and eyewitness testimonies from the event itself, evidence collected and presented by the House January 6 committee, the special prosecutor report, and the criminal trial which ended abruptly with Trump’s reelection. They also interview Trump and his supporters and present their points of view fairly and objectively. Watch it, convince two other people to watch it, and convince them to convince two other people to watch it.

the Antichrist!!!

Leave a reply

Some people believe in a literal Antichrist, while some believe “there is a little Antichrist in all of us”, apparently. I would tend to argue for the latter in the sense that the concept of right and wrong are uniquely human and we have certainly shown ourselves capable of both.

However large he looms in modern Christian storytelling, he’s referenced in only four passages of the Bible. The word Antichrist appears nowhere but in one of John’s epistles, which also warns that “even now many antichrists have come,” indicating, as Trelawny puts it, those who reject “that Jesus is the Christ, or Messiah…”

The apostle Paul or one of his disciples, in a letter to the Thessalonians, foresees the rise of “a mysterious figure known only as ‘the lawless one,’ who will gain power by deceiving people through false miracles, and once in power, he will commit his greatest crime of all: ‘He will oppose and exalt himself over everything that is called God or worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.” For its part, the Book of Revelation adds “the arrival of a monstrous seven-headed beast,” and later, a companion with “the horns of a lamb but the voice of a dragon.” Thereafter comes the “mark of the beast,” 666 — or perhaps 616, Trelawny adds, given that either could be seen as code for Neron Kaisar in Greek or Nero Caesar in Latin, better known as the ancient Roman Emperor Nero.

My favorite literary Antichrist is of course Stephen King’s “Walking Man” from The Stand.

Woody Guthrie vs. Old Man Trump

Donald Trump’s father was Woodie Guthrie’s landlord at one point. Woodie Guthrie had things to say about that, which he wrote down, such as

Beach Haven ain’t my home!
I just cain’t pay this rent!
My money’s down the drain!
And my soul is badly bent!
Beach Haven looks like heaven
Where no black ones come to roam!
No, no, no! Old Man Trump!
Old Beach Haven ain’t my home!

The U.S. government rewarded landlords for being racist at the time, but even considering that, Trump just sounds particularly vicious and racist. It’s also a data point showing that Donald J. Trump grew up in a family where openly racist views would have been expressed frequently and without remorse.

how to be a traitor to the United States of America

I happen to like my country, but I would like to offer some suggestions on policy options for the aspiring traitor:

  1. Remove funding for basic scientific research other than in weapons. This investment will take a while to pay off, but long term it will remove the basis for economic growth as an advanced economy, until one day we can no longer be an advanced economy.
  2. Make sure only the rich can afford adequate child care. This will ensure that single parents and adults in single-income households (usually mothers) will not be able to work or study. This removes a good chunk of the potential work force, and makes sure those women will not gain new skills or knowledge that might allow them to contribute to our economy. You can also remove access to birth control to help reinforce this cycle, and you have also retarded any progress on new or better birth control technology.
  3. Undermine education at all levels. This is also a slow burner because it will take a generation for today’s toddlers to become tomorrow’s ignorant incompetent adults (he who knows not and knows not he knows not, he is a child, be careful not to teach him anything). There are some immediate things you can do though. A big one is stop issuing visas for full-pay international students. This immediately subtracts hard currency from the nation’s economy, and also has an additional payoff tomorrow of making sure they can’t stay in the country and add value to the economy.
  4. Identify industries where the United States has a comparative advantage, and sabotage them. Also reduce the pool of skilled workers they have access to. If you’re lucky, they will throw up their hands and leave the country for a techno-libertarian island dystopia.
  5. Invest heavily in industries with no comparative advantage for an advanced economy. Textiles and footwear come to mind. But then you can also undermine free trade in general so that nobody will be interested in buying inferior, high-cost products anyway. By undermining research and development, you have also made sure that potential high-value-added industries like robotics and autonomous electric vehicles can never keep up with higher-tech, more productive foreign economies.
  6. Let the transportation, water, electric, and food infrastructure decay. You don’t have to actually do anything here. Just don’t talk about it and nobody will know or care or do anything.
  7. Here’s where it gets wonky, but you want to put incompetent people in charge of monetary policy and generally all things to do with money and finance. Do this, then get out of the way while the financial industry captures and manipulates your idiots to its short-term advantage while creating an unstable house of cards that will come crashing down in the not-too-distant future. Crypto-currency is not the core of this strategy but just a little extra grease on the wheels of chaos.
  8. Undermine the nation’s ability to prepare for, respond, and recover from natural disasters, such as fires, coastal and inland flooding, hurricanes and other severe storms, and earthquakes. There’s a certain element of chance here. You could get a major volcanic eruption if you are lucky, but you can’t control that. Drought and generally poor water management are some of those slow-burn policies that could take a long time to pay off, but climate change is on your side here. As they say, the end of civilization as we know it is two meals away.
  9. This is somewhat of a tricky play, but through a combination of foreign aid removal, lack of action on climate change, and poor diplomacy with nearby countries, you can ramp up flows of desperate migrants. This gives local people somebody to blame for all their problems other than your policies.
  10. Apply propaganda judiciously to make sure Americans don’t know Chinese factories are building autonomous vehicles for $10,000 and investing in ultra-modern high speed rail and automated ports. Also use anti-tax, anti-immigrant, anti-city, and anti-poor people propaganda (the last two go together pretty well) so that nobody will be willing to fund the government or expect it to do anything.

You might be surprised that I have left certain seemingly obvious policies off this list. But I actually would not send an angry mob to attack the legislative building or set it on fire. It’s better to have the empty symbols of democracy sitting there for people to look at. I would not cancel elections, but rather limit the choices to a few very bad ones. I would not blatantly limit speech but rather do the opposite, encouraging a huge amount of meaningless talky-talk so that everyone’s jaws are flapping at the same time and there is no way anyone can be listening let alone thinking.

Good luck, modern day Benedict Arnold, in your quest. And may God Bless the United States of America.

Project 2025 Tracker

Anonymous parties have put together a Project 2025 Tracker. They pulled out and listed all the individual policy recommendations in the document, and are trying to track which are complete, in progress, or not started. As I write, they put the agenda at 42% complete.

I would break the recommendations down into three categories: (1) Christian/White Nationalism, (2) Homophobia, and (3) Rich and Powerful/Big Business Giveaways.

his foolishness’s instincts on nuclear weapons

Let me be abundantly clear on my position: Donald Trump is a childish fool and I am embarrassed for my country on the world stage right now. I am desperately searching for some kind of silver lining and not coming up with much. One thing is that he has made some statements over the years suggesting he understands the need for nuclear arms control. Now, with all the verbal diarrhea that comes out of the man’s mouth, we have to always focus mostly on his actions rather than his words. But here are a few points:

  • New Start treaty – In 2020, Trump oversaw mostly successful negotiations to extend this treaty with Russia. It was provisionally extended for a year, and the Biden administration picked up where Trump left off and agreed with Russia to extend it for five years. It’s one of the ironies of political polarization that opposing sides are sometimes willing to compromise and cooperate as long as there is not too much publicity about it.
  • Iran nuclear treaty – Here Trump dealt a massive blow to global non-proliferation goals. Whatever his instincts, I assume Israeli pressure played a big role here.
  • Here are some weird statements Trump made in the September 2024 presidential debate. “But eventually, you know, he’s [Putin’s] got a thing that other people don’t have. He’s got nuclear weapons. They don’t ever talk about that. He’s got nuclear weapons. Nobody ever thinks about that. And eventually uh maybe he’ll use them. Maybe he hasn’t been that threatening. But he does have that. Something we don’t even like to talk about. Nobody likes to talk about it.” Weird, incorrect since obviously most people on earth are going to know that Russia is a nuclear power, and yet it shows that Trump is legitimately concerned about the risk of nuclear war.
  • From The Intercept: “There’s no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many… You could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons, and they’re building nuclear weapons.”
  • And also: “I’m going to say there’s no reason for us to be spending almost $1 trillion on the military. … I’m going to say we can spend this on other things… I want to say let’s cut our military budget in half. And we can do that.”

Seeing is believing, Senor Trumpez, and we will all see if these encouraging words lead anywhere.

Charlie Stross: “actual international Neo-Nazi conspiracy to destroy democracy globally”

Dearest readers, I have been dealing with a family emergency here on top of a plate that was already full before the family emergency. I am trying to be somewhat kind to myself and acknowledge that I have very real physical and mental limits. Which is a way of getting to my point that I might be doing some short posts for a little while. I would rather do short frequent posts than long, infrequent ones.

I am not as smart or entertaining and awesome a writer as Charlie Stross, obviously, but here is Charlie Stross acknowledging that he is somewhat overwhelmed by events and might be doing some short posts for awhile.

it’s really hard to write a good carpet-chewing rant by an evil wannabe galactic overlord against a background of an actual international Neo-Nazi conspiracy to destroy democracy globally, and another international conspiracy of billionaires trying to immanetize the AI eschaton and enslave everyone else, and … and … fuck, even Space Opera isn’t safe from the maniacs these days!

You can make fun of people who are serious but somewhat bumbling (think of George Bush or, gulp, Joe Biden) but it is hard to make fun of evil clowns. Clowns can be funny, but only when they are not evil.

Donald Trump causes evil clown panic to worsen

Okay, put an evil clown in a diaper and it’s at least a little bit funny…until they come for you or someone you care about.

the Civil Rights Act

I admit I don’t know much about the Civil Rights Act. I learned about Martin Luther King Jr.’s more positive moments 67 times in school, but I learned about neither his darker moments nor the ground-breaking legislation his leadership helped bring about. One thing I do know pretty well is the Clean Water Act. In the Clean Water Act, permittees (basically any entity with a pipe or ditch leading to a surface water, including factories obviously but also most cities, towns and larger developments, only not most farms) are required by law to collect data on what they are discharging and report it to their state environmental agency, which is required to report it to the federal Environmental Protection Agency. If they are discharging more than they should, the state agency has to step in (typically this means fine them once, then sue if that doesn’t work), and if the state agency fails, the EPA has to step in. If either the state or EPA fails, third party non-profit groups will step in and sue. (This seems unfair, but normally they sue the permittee, and the state and federal agencies will sign on to the lawsuit on the side of the third-party group. Basically the state and federal agencies are doing what would have been their job anyway, but the lawsuit has forced their hand in making this particular permittee a priority.)

Anyway, it would be hard for Presidential cronies to break this system. It is law and it is decentralized among federal, state, and private entities. The Clean Water Act was passed in 1972.

Now we turn to the Civil Rights Act, which was passed in 1964. It prohibits discrimination in the hiring and firing process, period. So why are we arguing about “affirmative action” and “diversity equity and inclusion” in 2025?

This is from a blog called Popular Information, which is written by Judd Legum, the founder of ThinkProgress. And that’s everything I know about it, so consider the credibility of the source as you consider this:

Trump issued an executive order repealing Executive Order 11246, which was put in place by Lyndon Johnson in 1965. For 60 years, Executive Order 11246 prohibited government contractors with contracts of more than $10,000 from discriminating in hiring or employment based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin…

it contained two words that became very controversial, and those were “affirmative action.” Affirmative action had been used in a previous executive order by John F. Kennedy, but it was still undefined. And so, over the rest of the Johnson administration and into the Nixon administration, there was a lot of discussion and debate about what exactly affirmative action meant. And so that became a critical part of the legacy. It was resolved by Nixon. The Nixon administration allowed for the use of goals and timetables to measure the inclusion of minorities and other protected groups within government contractors, and that process has been more or less in place since. Essentially, 11246, with some modest amendments, since 1965 has been in place as the primary mechanism for enforcing nondiscrimination in government contracts and also by government vendors and subcontractors…

Under 11246, government contractors have to demonstrate that they have a plan for reaching out to protected groups, including minorities and women. And then they have to report on the composition of their workforces, or their subcontractors.

So like the Clean Water Act, regulated parties had to actively collect and submit data to show they were complying with the Civil Rights Act. This data could be scrutinized by public and private entities, leading to enforcement by public agencies and the threat of private law suits to force public agencies to do their jobs if that was necessary. But unlike the Clean Water Act, the requirement to collect and submit the data was the result of an executive order and not a law. So some lawyer in Trump’s camp was smart and evil enough to understand this and to remove that reporting requirement after 60+ years. The law is still there, but it will be harder to monitor and prove that someone is breaking the law.

The obvious solution going forward would seem to be for Congress to amend the Civil Rights Act to include the text of the executive order. It would even make a lot of sense to add the protections of the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act to the U.S. Constitution itself. These things are not going to happen while the current iteration of the Good Ol’ Neo-Nazi Party is in the majority, despite support for basic bedrock civil rights being a bipartisan consensus for many decades under many center-right administrations.